Tennessee House Bill HB1837

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/24/24
• Refer: 2/12/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Engrossed: 2/27/24
• Enrolled: 3/15/24
• Passed: 3/27/24
• Chaptered: 4/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 10, Chapter 7 and Title 49, relative to student information.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1837 is expected to enhance the privacy protections of student information within Tennessee's public higher education system. By ensuring that third-party contractors are bound by strict agreements, the bill seeks to prevent misuse of personal data and protect students' privacy rights. This amendment reflects a growing concern about data security and the appropriate use of sensitive information in the educational context.

Summary

House Bill 1837, introduced by Representative Rudd, aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding the handling of student information by public institutions of higher education. The key provision of the bill restricts these institutions from sharing personally identifiable information (PII) of students with third-party contractors unless certain conditions are met. Specifically, contractors must agree in writing that the student information will be used solely for the administrative purposes intended and will not be sold or shared with other entities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1837 appears to be supportive, particularly among advocates for student rights and privacy protections. Proponents argue that stricter controls on the sharing of sensitive student data are essential in today's digital age, where data breaches and misuse of personal information are prevalent. While there may be some concerns from educational institutions about potential administrative burdens or operational impacts, the overall tone suggests that the bill is viewed positively in the context of safeguarding student information.

Contention

Notable contention regarding HB 1837 may arise from the implications for third-party contractors who provide administrative services to educational institutions. Some stakeholders may argue that the requirements imposed by the bill could complicate existing contracts or introduce barriers to efficient data management processes. Critics may also raise questions about the practicality of implementing the necessary agreements and monitoring compliance among contractors, which could impact the operational dynamics of higher education institutions.