Tennessee House Bill HB1882

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 3/26/24
• Refer: 4/3/24
• Chaptered: 5/9/24
• Passed: 5/9/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 34; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to medical records.

Impact

By establishing this ten-day timeframe, HB1882 is aimed at enhancing patient access to their medical information, an essential aspect of patient autonomy and rights. This legislation could significantly affect healthcare practices within Tennessee, pushing providers to improve their administrative processes to meet these new requirements. The bill's introduction reflects a broader trend in healthcare legislation focused on transparency and patient empowerment.

Summary

House Bill 1882 seeks to amend the Tennessee Code regarding the provision of medical records by healthcare providers. The primary objective of this bill is to mandate that healthcare providers furnish copies of patients' medical records to either the patient or their authorized representative within ten working days following a written request. The bill reinforces the right of patients and their representatives to obtain full medical records, ensuring that summaries provided by providers do not substitute for the complete records required by law.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1882 appears largely favorable among advocates of patient rights and healthcare transparency. Supporters argue that timely access to medical records is crucial for informed decision-making and continuity of care. However, there may be concerns from healthcare providers regarding the logistical implications of these requirements, which could require adjustments to their operational workflow.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include discussions about the practicality and cost implications for healthcare providers in efficiently delivering medical records within the stipulated timeframe. While proponents emphasize the importance of patient rights, critics may argue that the bill imposes additional burdens on healthcare providers that could divert resources away from patient care.