Tennessee House Bill HB1887

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 2/13/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Refer: 3/20/24
• Refer: 3/26/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24
• Passed: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 8-33-110 and Section 58-1-230, relative to employment benefits for Tennessee service members.

Impact

If enacted, the bill aims to provide clearer and more comprehensive benefits for Tennessee service members in line with their contributions and sacrifices. By ensuring that the compensation is based on their average weekly wage at the time of deployment and guaranteeing minimum payouts, the bill is designed to ensure financial security for the families and injured members of the National Guard. This adjustment to the legal framework would reflect an acknowledgment of the unique nature of military service and the need for robust support for service members and their beneficiaries.

Summary

House Bill 1887 is proposed legislation aimed at amending Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 8-33-110 and 58-1-230, concerning employment benefits for Tennessee service members. The bill seeks to enhance the support for members of the National Guard by setting provisions for death and injury benefits. Specifically, it stipulates a minimum death benefit of $100,000 and introduces rules for compensation equivalent to those provided under the state's Workers' Compensation Law for injuries sustained during duty activities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB1887 appears to be positive among the legislators who support the bill, viewing it as a meaningful step towards recognizing the risks that service members face. Proponents advocate for the necessity of `stronger safety nets` for those who serve, suggesting that the bill addresses long-standing gaps in existing compensation structures. However, some concerns may arise regarding the sufficiency of funding to meet the demands of the new benefits, and how these changes might affect the state's financial obligations.

Contention

While largely seen as a beneficial measure, there may be contention related to the funding sources for the increased benefits and whether such changes could lead to higher costs for the state. Legislators and stakeholders may debate the sustainability of funding these benefits amid other state financial commitments. As the legislative session progresses, discussions will likely revolve around the implications of implementing these proposed amendments, ensuring they are both beneficial for service members while remaining fiscally responsible.