Tennessee House Bill HB1971

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24
• Passed: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 71-5-1203, relative to Tennessee opportunity pilot program grants.

Impact

The introduction of HB 1971 is significant for the administration of state-funded programs. The bill enhances the department's authority to manage grants, thus streamlining the contract process and ensuring that the state can adapt its strategy as needed to meet specific goals within the designated timeline. This amendment represents a shift towards a more flexible and responsive management framework for state programs, which could result in improved outcomes and better utilization of resources allocated for the Tennessee opportunity pilot program.

Summary

House Bill 1971 seeks to amend Section 71-5-1203 of the Tennessee Code Annotated by adding provisions that enhance the capabilities of the state's department to implement and manage the Tennessee opportunity pilot program grants. This amendment allows the department to enter into or modify existing contracts to ensure the successful execution of the program, with a specific stipulation that no contractual arrangements can extend beyond December 31, 2026. This reflects a targeted effort to bolster state programs that potentially deliver economic and social benefits to Tennessee residents through effective grant management.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 1971 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe that the ability to amend contracts will enable more effective program management. Proponents argue that this flexibility is essential for the successful adaptation and implementation of the pilot program. However, there may also be concerns regarding accountability and oversight, especially with the potential for contracts to be altered without extensive legislative input or community engagement.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 1971 could arise from its provisions allowing the department to amend contracts with less constraint than typical legislative procedures would require. Critics may argue that this could lead to a lack of transparency or the potential for decisions that do not adequately consider the public interest. Ensuring that grant implementation aligns with community needs while managing the timelines and goals set forth in the bill will be essential for maintaining public trust and support for the program.