Tennessee House Bill HB2086

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Refer: 3/20/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24
• Passed: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 56 and Title 68, relative to 340B program entities.

Impact

If enacted, HB2086 would significantly revise the way that corporations involved in healthcare may access resources and funding through federal grant programs. By excluding corporations from receiving certain in-kind contributions funded federally, it targets the operations of healthcare entities that benefit from 340B discounts. This could lead to a reshaping of how such entities manage and utilize federal support, thus affecting overall healthcare accessibility and quality in the state.

Summary

House Bill 2086 seeks to amend certain provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically concerning the 340B program. This bill proposes to restrict corporations from receiving in-kind contributions that are funded through federal grant programs outlined in the Public Health Service Act. The legislation aims to address concerns about the eligibility of entities participating in the 340B program and, potentially, to ensure that federal funds are being utilized appropriately within the healthcare system.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2086 appears to be mixed. Supporters may argue that the bill is necessary for maintaining the integrity of the 340B program and ensuring that resources are directed toward legitimate uses, which is vital for public health initiatives. Opponents, however, might view this as an unnecessary restriction that could limit the ability of healthcare organizations to maximize the benefits from federal grants, potentially impacting their service delivery and access to care for patients.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential implications for healthcare corporations that rely on federal funding and their ability to provide services under the 340B program. Critics of the bill may raise concerns about the balance between regulation and access to essential healthcare resources, arguing that the limitations imposed could hinder the effectiveness of healthcare delivery systems. This highlights a broader debate about the governance of healthcare funding and the roles of different entities within the healthcare landscape.