Tennessee House Bill HB2133

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Refer: 1/31/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Chapter 50 and Title 49, relative to tuition discounts.

Impact

The enactment of HB2133 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws related to tuition assistance and financial support for students within Tennessee's education system. By targeting children of public employees, the bill is poised to enhance educational opportunities for those from families dedicated to public service. This legislative change could bolster enrollment numbers in state-operated vocational schools and institutions of higher learning, particularly appealing to students who might face financial barriers to entry otherwise.

Summary

House Bill 2133 aims to amend specific provisions in the Tennessee Code Annotated to implement a 25% tuition discount for certain individuals under 24 years of age based on their parent's employment status. Specifically, children whose parents are full-time state, county, or municipal employees, have died in off-the-job incidents related to their employment, or are retired after a minimum service period will be eligible for this discount. The bill emphasizes support for students from families connected to public service, thereby fostering accessibility to higher education and vocational training.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive, particularly among advocates of educational access and public service recognition. Supporters argue that the bill reflects an appreciation for the sacrifices made by public employees and their families, aiming to alleviate the financial burden associated with higher education. There may, however, be varying opinions on whether this enhanced tuition support is the best method to address broader challenges in the education system, with some opposing viewpoints emphasizing the need for a more universal approach to tuition and aid.

Contention

Discussion around HB2133 may invoke debates concerning the prioritization of state funding and differential treatment in tuition support. While supporters laud the recognition of public service, others may argue about the fairness and sustainability of allocating resources in this manner, especially when considering the financial demands placed on the state budget. Additionally, there could be concerns regarding the implications for other tuition relief programs, as well as the potential creation of perceptions of inequality among students based on their parents' employment status.