Tennessee House Bill HB2198

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/31/24
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Refer: 3/19/24
• Engrossed: 3/26/24
• Enrolled: 4/12/24
• Passed: 5/1/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, relative to threats of mass violence.

Impact

The enactment of HB 2198 will have a significant impact on state laws regarding threats and criminal liability. By categorizing threats of mass violence as a felony, the bill brings about stricter penalties that fall under criminal law provisions. This change is aimed at providing heightened protections for schools and reinforcing the seriousness with which such threats are regarded in the state’s legal framework. The law will potentially increase the number of individuals prosecuted for making threats and could lead to more severe legal repercussions for offenders.

Summary

House Bill 2198 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting threats of mass violence, particularly on school properties and during school-related activities. The bill redefines the classification of such threats as a Class E felony, which enhances the penalties associated with these offenses. The intent behind this legislation is to increase accountability and deter individuals from making threats that could endanger the safety of students and staff in educational environments. It is set to take effect on July 1, 2024, and applies to offenses committed from that date onwards.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 2198 appears to be supportive among lawmakers, particularly those prioritizing school safety measures. Advocates for the bill, including several representatives, express the need for stronger legislative responses to threats in educational settings, reflecting a proactive approach to safeguarding children and educators. However, there may be concerns from civil rights groups regarding potential overreach and the implications for individuals, particularly in terms of due process and fairness in the legal proceedings following accusations of threats.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise around the bill’s implications for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The legislation explicitly states that it does not apply to such individuals, suggesting a recognition of the complexities surrounding mental health in legal matters. While this clause may alleviate some concerns regarding fairness, it also raises discussions about the appropriate balance between protecting public safety and ensuring equitable treatment under the law. Critics could argue that the definitions and classifications included in the bill might not sufficiently account for the nuances involved in each case of alleged threats.