Tennessee House Bill HB2297

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 3/19/24
• Refer: 3/27/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 71-5-164, relative to the Katie Beckett program.

Impact

The implications of HB 2297 include a significant increase in the number of children able to access the Medicaid program specifically tailored for those with disabilities. By setting a firm participant target, the bill aims to ensure that more families can benefit from necessary resources that may have been previously limited. The proposed funding underscores an initiative to fortify health services that are vital for the well-being of these children, thereby enhancing overall support for vulnerable populations in Tennessee.

Summary

House Bill 2297 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 71-5-164, regarding the Katie Beckett program. This bill seeks to establish a minimum of 5,000 participants in Part B of the program, which supports children with disabilities to receive necessary healthcare services. The legislative intent is to appropriate $13 million in the fiscal year 2024-2025 for this expansion, highlighting the state's commitment to meeting the demands of families seeking assistance for children with special needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2297 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for children with disabilities and healthcare services. Supporters argue that the expansion of the Katie Beckett program is a crucial step toward improving accessibility and delivering essential health services to a greater population. Nevertheless, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of funding and the potential bureaucratic challenges in implementing the expanded services effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 2297 could revolve around the appropriations necessary to fund the program fully and whether the state legislature can ensure the promised financial commitment to meet the initiative's goals. Discussion may also arise about the balance between expanding Medicaid services and managing the state's budget, particularly in light of increasing demands on public funds for health programs.