Tennessee House Bill HB2327

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 3/5/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24
• Passed: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 33; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to suicide.

Impact

The impact of HB2327 could be substantial, as it represents a proactive approach to tackling mental health crises through increased transparency and accountability. By establishing a systematic method for reporting suicide statistics, the bill aims to provide lawmakers with relevant data to guide future public health policy and resource allocation. This initiative is expected to place greater emphasis on mental health issues within legislative discussions, potentially leading to more comprehensive support systems for affected individuals and communities.

Summary

House Bill 2327, aimed at addressing suicide rates in Tennessee, proposes significant changes to existing public health practices. The bill mandates the Department of Health to publish an annual report detailing the total number of attempted and completed suicides in the state. By requiring this data to be submitted to the General Assembly electronically, the bill intends to enhance state oversight on mental health issues and to inform legislative action based on the prevalence of suicide in the community. The implementation deadline for this reporting system is set for May 31, 2025, and annual reports are to follow each year thereafter.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2327 appears to be generally positive, with many stakeholders recognizing the importance of addressing mental health and suicide. Supporters view the bill as an essential step toward creating a culture of awareness and responsiveness to mental health challenges. However, there may be concerns regarding the effectiveness of data collection and the adequacy of responses from the state in leveraging this data to impact change meaningfully.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB2327 may arise around the methodology of data collection and the interpretation of suicide statistics. Critics may challenge whether annual reporting alone is sufficient to prompt substantial improvements in mental health services or advocate for more aggressive interventions and funding. Additionally, discussions on data privacy and the implications of public reporting may be points of debate as stakeholders consider the balance between transparency and protecting the dignity of individuals affected by suicide.