Tennessee House Bill HB2341

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Failed: 3/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 4; Title 8; Title 38; Title 39 and Title 47, Chapter 18, relative to artificial intelligence.

Impact

The bill mandates that each executive branch department develop a strategic plan aimed at preventing the malicious and unlawful use of AI. This includes potential threats to individuals or entities regulated by these departments. By establishing a framework for AI governance, the bill aims to ensure that advancements in AI technology do not compromise public safety or ethical standards. Departments are also required to collaborate with law enforcement and other entities to create an effective response strategy.

Summary

House Bill 2341, introduced by Representative Pearson, seeks to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated to address the use and oversight of artificial intelligence (AI) within state departments. The bill outlines a comprehensive definition of AI, covering a variety of systems and techniques that operate without significant human oversight and can learn from experience. This definition encompasses not only software solutions but also physical systems that demonstrate human-like cognition and action, highlighting the broad application of AI technology across different sectors.

Conclusion

As HB2341 moves through the legislative process, it will likely prompt discussions about the role of AI in public policy and the responsibilities of state agencies in managing emerging technologies. The balance between fostering innovation and protecting citizens from potential harms associated with AI usage will be a central theme in debates surrounding this bill.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB2341 may revolve around the balance between regulation and innovation. Proponents of the bill argue that robust oversight is essential to prevent misuse of AI technologies, especially as they become increasingly integrated into governmental operations. However, critics may express concern that overly stringent regulations could stifle technological innovation and impede the development of beneficial AI applications in public service. The requirement for departments to develop compliance plans may also raise questions about the administrative burdens placed on state resources.