Tennessee House Bill HB2523

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Refer: 3/20/24
• Refer: 3/26/24
• Engrossed: 4/2/24
• Enrolled: 4/18/24
• Passed: 5/3/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 222 of the Public Acts of 1983, as amended by Chapter 488 of the Public Acts of 2021, and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District.

Impact

The bill is positioned to positively impact the governance of the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District by making the roles of board members more financially feasible. By increasing their compensation, the bill acknowledges the importance of their work in utility management and encourages capable individuals to serve on the board. Such an amendment could potentially lead to improved governance and management of utility services, ensuring better planning and expansion to meet community needs.

Summary

House Bill 2523 aims to amend Chapter 222 of the Public Acts dating back to 1983, specifically adjusting provisions related to the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District. The focal point of this amendment is to increase the monthly compensation for the utility district board members from $200 to $300. This change is a financial adjustment intended to address compensation concerns for board members who oversee water and utility services in the region.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2523 appears to be supportive, with no recorded opposition during its passage through the legislative process. The unanimous vote in favor of the bill demonstrates a widely shared agreement among legislators on the necessity of compensating utility board members adequately. This support reflects a collective understanding of the importance of maintaining strong leadership within essential regional services.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to have significant points of contention, it does open discussions regarding public funding and compensation for public service roles. Some may critique whether the increased compensation is justified against budget constraints or prioritize funding allocations. Nonetheless, the nature of the amendment is largely seen as a straightforward improvement, given the unanimous support it garnered during voting.