Tennessee House Bill HB2617

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 4/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 43; Title 44; Title 47; Title 48 and Title 66, relative to property.

Impact

The changes proposed by HB 2617 could have significant implications for property management and regulation in Tennessee. By allowing electronic submissions, the bill may facilitate better compliance among property owners and managers, making it easier to meet reporting requirements. This shift could lead to increased consistency in documentation and potentially reduce the administrative burden on property owners, thereby encouraging compliance and transparency in property dealings.

Summary

House Bill 2617 aims to amend multiple sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, focusing primarily on procedures related to property. One of the key provisions of this bill is the introduction of electronic submission for certain reports, which modernizes the process and is expected to improve efficiency. By adapting to technological advancements, the bill seeks to streamline bureaucratic processes and reduce the time and effort required for property-related documentation. This amendment aligns with broader efforts to embrace digital solutions in governmental operations.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 2617 appears to be positive, particularly among proponents who advocate for modernization and efficiency in governmental processes. Supporters believe that the move towards electronic reporting is a necessary step forward that will benefit both the state and its residents. However, there may be concerns regarding the digital divide and ensuring that all stakeholders have access to the necessary technology to comply with these changes.

Contention

While the bill's provisions seem straightforward, there are potential points of contention regarding the implementation of electronic submissions. Critics may raise concerns about data privacy, the security of electronically submitted reports, and the adequacy of support for individuals or entities that may struggle with the transition to electronic systems. Questions about whether this shift might unintentionally disadvantage those without reliable internet access could also be part of the debate surrounding the bill.