Tennessee House Bill HB2622

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 2/20/24
• Refer: 2/28/24
• Refer: 3/13/24
• Refer: 3/19/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24
• Passed: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to pharmacies.

Impact

The passage of HB 2622 will have significant implications for state laws governing pharmacy regulations in Tennessee. By introducing clearer provisions for the licensure of pharmacists and pharmacies, the bill aims to streamline the regulatory process. Additionally, the bill allows for the board to license ambulatory surgical treatment centers, which could lead to improved oversight and standards for these facilities. The changes are anticipated to lead to better coordinated healthcare services across state facilities, which, in turn, may enhance patient safety and operational efficiency.

Summary

House Bill 2622 aims to amend specific sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to the regulation and licensing of pharmacies. This bill is designed to update the provisions governing the licensure of pharmacists, pharmacies, and related entities, ensuring compliance with both state and federal laws. One of the main focuses of the bill is to provide clear guidelines for licensing ambulatory surgical treatment centers and ensuring that they comply with pharmacy operational laws. The legislation seeks to refine the framework within which pharmacies operate, potentially enhancing service delivery and regulatory compliance.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 2622 appears to be positive, as stakeholders recognize the necessity of updating regulatory frameworks to reflect current practices and standards in healthcare. Supporters view the bill as a step forward in improving the healthcare delivery system, while also ensuring that regulatory bodies can enforce compliance effectively. However, as with any regulatory change, there may be concerns regarding the implications for existing establishments during the transition to new licensing processes.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely revolve around the board's expanded authority and the potential impact this could have on existing pharmacies and surgical centers. Critics may argue that such sweeping regulatory changes could impose undue burdens on small pharmacies, potentially leading to challenges in compliance during the transition period. There may also be discussions regarding the adequacy of oversight to prevent any disruptions in service during the implementation of these new regulations.