Tennessee House Bill HB2651

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 16 and Title 18, relative to reports related to the operation of courts.

Impact

This legislative change aims to improve transparency within the criminal justice system by tracking court-imposed penalties and their collection processes. Additionally, it allows for a more systematic approach to data collection regarding the demographic information of defendants, including their economic status. By keeping a centralized database that includes these reports, Tennessee hopes to better align its judicial practices with the principles of fairness and justice, especially for economically disadvantaged individuals who may be disproportionately affected by fines and fees.

Summary

House Bill 2651 is an act designed to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 16 and Title 18, specifically addressing the operation and reporting requirements of courts related to fines and fees. The bill mandates that courts with criminal jurisdiction compile a monthly report detailing all fines and fees assessed, to be submitted to the administrative office of the courts. This report must include comprehensive data on various parameters, including the court that assessed the fines, case numbers, assessment dates, amounts, and any payment plans associated with those assessments. The intent is to create a clearer understanding of financial penalties imposed and to enhance administrative oversight.

Contention

Despite the benefits highlighted by supporters of the bill—such as increased transparency and better tracking of fines—there may be concerns regarding the operational impact this legislation could have on local courts and their resources. Some stakeholders could argue that the requirements to compile and report this data regularly may strain judicial resources, particularly in smaller jurisdictions where court personnel and administrative capabilities are limited. As such, debates may arise over the balance between enhanced accountability and the practical realities various courts face in implementing these reporting mandates.