Tennessee House Bill HB2655

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 37; Title 49; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to blood lead level testing.

Impact

The proposed amendments are likely to have a significant impact on public health policy regarding lead exposure. The bill places a responsibility on parents or guardians to ensure their children are tested, thereby empowering families to engage with essential health services. Furthermore, the inclusion of lead level testing for pregnant women receiving nutrition vouchers indicates a prioritization of maternal and child health, aiming to mitigate lead exposure risks from the outset. This legislation is anticipated to foster collaboration between health departments and educational agencies, ensuring comprehensive care for affected children, particularly those in juvenile detention facilities, who must also receive appropriate services in collaboration with local education agencies.

Summary

House Bill 2655 seeks to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to implement mandatory blood lead level testing for children and pregnant women. The bill mandates that the Department of Health provide blood lead testing for all children before they are allowed to attend public schools serving pre-kindergarten through grade 12. Additionally, if a child has elevated blood lead levels, the bill stipulates that they should receive immediate screening for educational services, as well as wraparound services for lead poisoning. This legislation underscores a proactive approach to managing the health risks associated with lead exposure in children, aimed at ensuring that they receive timely interventions and educational assistance when necessary.

Contention

Potential points of contention regarding HB2655 may arise from the implementation responsibilities placed on parents, particularly regarding the opt-out provision for testing. Critics may argue that without strict enforcement mechanisms, the bill could fail to reach its intended public health goals. Additionally, there may be discussions surrounding the adequacy of resources to support the mandated services for children and pregnant women, particularly in areas with limited access to healthcare. The emphasis on testing in public schools and juvenile detention facilities may also provoke debate on privacy and the broader implications of mandatory health screenings in public settings.