Tennessee House Bill HB2663

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/21/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to health care.

Impact

The amendment aims to streamline health care administration by providing additional time for compliance with certain regulations. Extending the deadline could benefit healthcare providers and agencies that need more time to prepare for annual reporting or compliance efforts. The adjustment may also serve to align timelines better with administrative capabilities or financial reporting that occurs early in the year, thereby potentially enhancing operational efficiency in the healthcare sector.

Summary

House Bill 2663 seeks to amend certain sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to health care, specifically altering deadlines for specific requirements. The proposed changes include modifying the deadline established in Section 68-1-123, shifting it from January 15 of each year to March 1 of each year. This adjustment is set to take effect on July 1, 2024, indicating a legislative intent to perhaps improve compliance or update existing procedures governing health care regulations in the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2663 appears to be neutral to positive, focusing more on the practical implications of the amendment rather than engaging in heated partisan debate. Stakeholders in the healthcare sector might view the increase in timeline favorably, as it allows for more thorough preparation without being rushed. However, there are no significant oppositional statements noted in the available discussions regarding the bill, suggesting a general consensus on this specific amendment’s usefulness.

Contention

While there do not seem to be major points of contention raised in the discussions surrounding HB2663, the amendments could generate varying opinions based on how the changes affect different stakeholders in the healthcare system. Some parties may express concerns if they perceive any negative consequences of the extended deadline on patient care or service delivery. As it stands, however, the focus has largely been on the administrative benefits rather than contentious objections.