Tennessee House Bill HB2790

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 3/26/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24
• Passed: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, relative to monitoring devices.

Impact

The implications of HB 2790 are significant. If enacted, the bill will amend several provisions of Tennessee's laws regarding monitoring devices. Law enforcement and judicial systems are expected to benefit from clearer communication protocols regarding violations of monitoring conditions, allowing for swifter action such as bail revocation when necessary. This change could reduce instances of offenders evading regulations, thereby contributing to community safety.

Summary

House Bill 2790 is aimed at amending Tennessee Code Annotated to strengthen the regulations surrounding the use of monitoring devices, such as transdermal or GPS monitors, for offenders who are on bail, parole, or probation. Specifically, the bill outlines that tampering with these devices would be classified as a Class B misdemeanor. This legislative approach is intended to enhance compliance among offenders, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of monitored release systems. It places a legal obligation on monitoring entities to report any tampering incidents promptly to the relevant authorities, thereby establishing a system of accountability.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2790 reflects a general push towards more stringent controls in the monitoring of offenders. Supporters advocate for the effectiveness of such measures in reducing recidivism rates and ensuring that monitored individuals adhere to their release conditions. However, there is apprehension among some advocacy groups regarding the potential for increased penalties to disproportionately affect marginalized communities, who may struggle with compliance due to socio-economic factors.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions about the bill center on the balance between public safety and the rights of individuals under supervision. Critics are concerned that broad definitions surrounding tampering could lead to unfair penalties, and there are ongoing conversations about the adequacy of legal protections for those monitored. Furthermore, the bill's enforcement mechanisms might reveal deeper systemic issues within the state's criminal justice system, prompting calls for reform apart from this legislative initiative.