Tennessee House Bill HB2809

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/14/24
• Refer: 4/2/24
• Refer: 4/9/24
• Chaptered: 6/3/24
• Passed: 6/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 38 and Title 39, relative to firearms.

Impact

If enacted, HB2809 will have implications for individuals who are retired law enforcement officers in Tennessee. By formally recognizing them under the law as having the same rights regarding firearms as active officers, the bill seeks to promote public safety while also respecting the contributions and experiences of veterans in law enforcement. This can lead to changes in how retired officers engage with law enforcement authorities and the community at large concerning firearm possession and usage.

Summary

House Bill 2809 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Titles 38 and 39, relating to firearms. The bill proposes to expand the definition of a 'law enforcement officer' to explicitly include retired officers who are carrying firearms in accordance with certain sections of the law. This change is aimed at providing clarity on the status of retired law enforcement personnel when it comes to firearm usage and recognition under the law. The bill reflects a move to acknowledge the ongoing relationship that retired officers have with law enforcement practices, particularly regarding firearms.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB2809 appears to lean favorably among supporters who appreciate the acknowledgment of retired officers. Proponents argue that this recognition is essential in ensuring that such individuals maintain their rights and responsibilities regarding public safety and firearms. However, there may also be concerns among some legislators or community members about how this expanded definition could impact public safety, especially in discussions about the responsibilities that come with firearm possession.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill could arise from concerns about the potential misuse of firearms by retired officers under this expanded definition. Critics may argue that while recognition is warranted, ensuring rigorous standards for firearm possession and responsibility among retired officers is crucial to safeguarding public welfare. Additionally, questions may arise about the implications of this change in law for training, accountability, and the interpretation of firearm regulations in Tennessee.