Tennessee House Bill HB2888

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Refer: 3/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 29, relative to land use regulation.

Impact

The bill introduces a legal framework requiring public entities to notify property owners when enacting new regulations that could impact property values. Should a regulation reduce the value by at least 10% or more than $50,000, property owners are entitled to compensation. This legal recourse can potentially affect the ability of local governments to implement zoning laws and land use policies, creating a more standardized approach to property rights across Tennessee.

Summary

House Bill 2888, known as the 'Private Property Protection Act,' aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 29, with a specific focus on land use regulations. The bill seeks to establish a statutory process that allows private property owners to seek judicial relief when governmental actions result in a decrease in the value of their property. This process includes provisions for property owners to receive 'just compensation' if new land use regulations restrict existing property uses significantly, causing a decrease in fair market value.

Sentiment

Reactions to HB 2888 are mixed among legislators and advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect private property rights and ensure that owners are compensated for losses due to regulatory changes. They see it as a safeguard against overreach by local governments. Conversely, opponents express concerns that the bill might hinder local governments' capacities to enforce essential land use policies designed to protect public health and safety, fostering a climate of legal disputes over property rights.

Contention

A notable point of contention lies in the definition of 'just compensation' and the circumstances under which it applies. Critics warn that the provisions could lead to challenges in enforcing local regulations that are crucial for community standards and environmental preservation. Additionally, the bill's exemptions from compensation for regulations aimed at public health and safety may be perceived as insufficient, raising concerns about the balance between property rights and community well-being.