Tennessee House Bill HB2938

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 43 and Title 44, relative to commercial breeders.

Impact

One of the principal impacts of HB 2938 is its establishment of a regulatory framework aimed at safeguarding the welfare of animals being bred commercially. The bill mandates that all commercial breeding premises be inspected before a license is issued, with criteria in place to ensure animals are provided with adequate shelter, climate control, and care. In case a breeder violates any provisions, hefty penalties may be imposed, including potential revocation of their license and prohibition from future breeding activities. Additionally, the bill allows local governments the authority to enact more stringent regulations than those set by state law, creating a layered approach to animal welfare.

Summary

House Bill 2938 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 4, Title 43, and Title 44, imposing a structured licensure process for commercial breeders. The bill defines a commercial breeder as any individual maintaining ten or more dogs or cats for the purpose of selling their offspring. Under this bill, the Department of Commerce and Insurance is given the authority to create and administer regulations regarding the licensure of these breeders, thereby ensuring compliance with humane care standards for the animals involved. This initiative is intended to enhance animal welfare in commercial breeding practices across Tennessee.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 2938 include concerns from animal rights advocates and some legislators who argue the bill does not go far enough in protecting animals. Critics claim the licensing and regulatory measures may still allow operations that prioritize profits over proper animal care. Furthermore, the licensing fee structure, set at a maximum of $15 for each adult female dog or cat, has been categorized by opponents as inadequate in deterring poorly run breeding facilities. This debate highlights the tension between fostering a regulated breeding environment and ensuring strict animal welfare standards are upheld.