Tennessee House Bill HB2987

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/24
• Refer: 3/4/24
• Refer: 3/19/24
• Engrossed: 3/26/24
• Enrolled: 4/2/24
• Passed: 4/22/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 78 of the Private Acts of 2014; and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to the charter for the City of Algood.

Impact

The revisions proposed in HB 2987 are designed to streamline the operational framework of the City of Algood. By clarifying the powers of the municipal government regarding property management and corporate activities, the bill potentially positions Algood to better respond to community needs and economic opportunities. The focus on property authority could facilitate more robust planning and development strategies, fostering an environment conducive to growth and community advancement.

Summary

House Bill 2987 aims to amend the City of Algood's charter established in the Private Acts of 2014. The bill makes several significant modifications to the charter, including the redefinition of the city's corporate status, allowing it to own, acquire, and dispose of property both within and outside city limits. These amendments are intended to enhance the administrative capacities of Algood, promoting its ability to manage its affairs effectively as a municipal entity. The bill's enactment hinges upon approval by a two-thirds majority of the Algood legislative body, showcasing a degree of autonomy in local governance.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 2987 appears to be largely favorable among local authorities and legislative proponents who see it as a necessary step for modernizing governance structures at the city level. The bill received unanimous support in its recent voting, reflecting a consensus on its importance for the city’s future. However, concerns may arise from citizens regarding the implications of expanded corporate powers and the degree of influence local officials will exert in property-related matters.

Contention

While there appears to be broad support for the bill within the legislature, potential areas of contention may involve discussions about the balance of power between local governance and state oversight. The requirement for a two-thirds vote at the local level for the bill to take effect indicates an intention to ensure that any changes have substantial local backing. Attention to transparency in how the city will exercise its newfound corporate powers will likely be paramount to assuage any concerns from constituents about overreach or mismanagement.