Tennessee House Bill HJR0050

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/20/23
• Failed: 3/21/23

Caption

A RESOLUTION to propose an amendment to Article I of the Constitution of Tennessee, relative to the right to the preservation of natural resources.

Impact

If passed, this amendment would enshrine the right to a healthy environment into the state constitution, which could have significant implications for future environmental legislation and policy decisions in Tennessee. It may foster greater accountability among state officials regarding environmental conservation and potentially influence how natural resource management is approached in the state, especially in light of ongoing environmental challenges.

Summary

HJR0050 proposes an amendment to Article I of the Tennessee Constitution, asserting the right of citizens to a healthy environment and the preservation of natural resources. This resolution acknowledges the importance of clean air, pure water, and the protection of scenic, historic, and aesthetic values of the environment. It declares that Tennessee's public natural resources are the common property of the people, including future generations, and establishes the state as a trustee responsible for maintaining these resources for the benefit of all citizens.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HJR0050 appears to be supportive among environmental advocates and some lawmakers who prioritize ecological sustainability and public health. They view the resolution as a vital step toward protecting Tennessee's natural resources and enhancing public awareness of environmental issues. On the other hand, there may be concerns from certain industries or stakeholders who fear that such an amendment could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny or limitations on development.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HJR0050 may include how the amendment would be implemented and the potential reactions from various sectors, particularly those engaged in industries that rely on natural resource extraction or land use. The amendment's broad language about environmental rights could lead to debates about its interpretation in legal contexts, necessitating clarity on its legal standing and practical applications if enacted.