Tennessee Senate Bill SB0776

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Engrossed: 3/6/23
• Enrolled: 4/11/23
• Passed: 4/25/23
• Chaptered: 5/3/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 12 and Title 39, Chapter 13, relative to unmanned aircraft.

Impact

The passage of SB0776 represents a significant regulatory shift in how unmanned aircraft are procured and utilized by law enforcement and state agencies in Tennessee. By enforcing restrictions on the acquisition of drones from specific manufacturers, the bill heightens the state's compliance with federal standards, aiming to protect sensitive operations and prevent potential vulnerabilities associated with foreign-made technology. This law, taking effect on July 1, 2023, will particularly influence local governments and enforcement agencies that utilize drones for various purposes, including surveillance and crime prevention.

Summary

Senate Bill 0776 aims to amend certain sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding the acquisition and use of unmanned aircraft or drones by state and local agencies. Specifically, the bill prohibits state agencies from purchasing or acquiring drones manufactured by entities listed as banned under Section 889 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2019. This legislative measure seeks to ensure that public agencies do not engage with manufacturers that pose national security risks, thereby aligning state procurement practices with federal guidelines.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0776 appears largely supportive among legislators, with a unanimous voting outcome reflecting a consensus on the importance of safeguarding public agency operations from potential security threats associated with foreign drone manufacturers. The measure has been viewed favorably as a proactive step in protecting the integrity of law enforcement technology, suggesting a recognition of evolving threats in the aerospace and defense sectors.

Contention

While consensus marks the legislative process for SB0776, some concerns have arisen regarding the implications of such restrictions on local agencies’ operational capabilities and their access to the latest drone technologies. Critics might argue that overly stringent regulations could hinder local law enforcement in their efforts to effectively employ drone technology for public safety and crime investigation, potentially leading to operational inefficiencies. However, supporters maintain that national security takes precedence, arguing that the benefits of preventing potential threats far outweigh any limitations placed on local innovation.