Tennessee Senate Bill SB2352

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24
• Passed: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 222 of the Public Acts of 1983, as amended by Chapter 488 of the Public Acts of 2021, and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will directly impact compensation structures within the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District. By increasing the compensation for its members, the bill aims to enhance recruitment efforts for qualified individuals willing to serve on the district's board. This change may lead to improved oversight and management of utility services in the region, ultimately impacting local service delivery and operational efficiency.

Summary

Senate Bill 2352 seeks to amend Chapter 222 of the Public Acts of 1983, specifically updating the financial provisions related to the Reelfoot Lake Regional Utility and Planning District. The bill proposes to increase the monthly compensation for members of this utility district from $200 to $300. This adjustment reflects an attempt to better compensate individuals involved in the management of state utilities, ensuring fair remuneration for their responsibilities and efforts in overseeing the planning and operational governance of the district.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 2352 appears to be generally positive, particularly among supporters who advocate for fair compensation as a critical factor in maintaining effective governance. Advocates argue that appropriate financial recognition can attract more qualified candidates, while detractors remain silent, suggesting a lack of significant opposition or contention over the proposed changes. The general consensus seems to favor adjustments that would encourage local leadership in utilities management.

Contention

Notably, there appears to be minimal contention surrounding SB 2352, possibly due to the clear benefits outlined in increasing compensation. The bill passed through the Senate Finance, Ways, and Means Committee with a significant majority, indicating strong legislative support. Furthermore, given the specific nature of the bill, it does not appear to impinge upon broader legislative debates or introduce controversial regulations within the larger framework of state law.