Tennessee 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Tennessee House Bill HB0956 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/19/2025

                    HB 956 - SB 903 
FISCAL NOTE 
 
 
 
Fiscal Review Committee 
Tennessee General Assembly 
 
March 19, 2025 
Fiscal Analyst: Natalie Dusek | Email: natalie.dusek@capitol.tn.gov | Phone: 615-741-2564 
 
HB 956 - SB 903 
 
SUMMARY OF BILL:    Prohibits a person from selling, transferring ownership, purchasing, 
or obtaining a firearm unless one of the following applies: 
• The seller or transferor is a federally-licensed gun dealer (gun dealer); 
• The seller or transferor makes the sale or transfer to or through a gun dealer and 
obtains a receipt; 
• The sale or transfer of ownership of the firearm is one of the following: 
o A firearm classified as an antique firearm under current law; 
o A transfer of a firearm between gun dealers or between wholesalers and 
dealers; or 
o A transfer of any firearm to a law enforcement or military agency; 
• The transferor is transferring ownership of the firearm to a family member by gift, 
bequest, or inheritance; the transferee is not prohibited from possessing a firearm 
under this part; and the transferee is at least 18 years of age; or 
• The transferor is transferring ownership of the firearm with the intent that the transfer 
be temporary, neither the transferor nor the transferee is prohibited from possessing a 
firearm under this part, and the purpose of the transfer is not prohibited by law. 
 
Creates a Class B misdemeanor offense for a person who intentionally violates the prohibition. 
Establishes a penalty for the offense as a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $10,000, and 
imprisonment for a period not to exceed nine months. 
 
 
FISCAL IMPACT: 
 
OTHER FISCAL IMPACT 
 
There will be a recurring mandatory increase in local expenditures related to incarceration in FY25-
26 and subsequent years.  Due to unknown variables, a precise estimate of this increase cannot be 
quantified. 
 
To the extent the proposed legislation results in an increase to the number of firearms sales 
transacted through federally-licensed firearm dealers, there will be an increase in revenue associated 
with sales tax and TBI background check fees.  Due to multiple unknown variables, any such impact 
cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. 
      
Article II, Section 24 of the Tennessee Constitution provides that:  no law of general application shall impose increased expenditure 
requirements on cities or counties unless the General Assembly shall provide that the state share in the cost. 
      
   
 	HB 956 - SB 903  	2 
 Assumptions: 
 
• The proposed legislation is estimated to increase the number of firearms sales transacted 
through dealers, therefore resulting in an increase in revenue associated with sales tax and 
TBI background check fees. Based upon multiple unknown variables, any such impact 
cannot be determined with reasonable certainty.  
• It is assumed that a cohort of the population will continue to sell and transfer firearms 
outside of the walls of a gun dealer and in violation of the proposed legislation.  It is 
therefore assumed that the legislation will result in an increase in Class B misdemeanors. 
• It is estimated that, on average, persons convicted of a Class B misdemeanor offense serve 
one day in jail. 
• Based on cost estimates provided by local government entities throughout the state and 
reported bed capacity within such facilities, the weighted average cost per day to house an 
inmate in a local jail facility is $61.99. 
• Therefore, the legislation is estimated to result in a mandatory increase in local expenditures 
related to incarceration in FY25-26 and subsequent years. 
• There is no reliable data available on the number of sales and transfers of firearms that 
occur among those not licensed as gun dealers.  It is not known how many such sales or 
transfers will continue to occur, or how many will result in a misdemeanor conviction.  As 
such, a precise estimate of the increase in local expenditures related to incarceration cannot 
be reasonably determined.  
• Based on the Fiscal Review Committee’s 2008 study and the Administrative Office of the 
Courts’ 2012 study on collection of court costs, fees, and fines, collection in criminal cases 
is minimal due to defendants often not being able to pay them; therefore, any increase in 
local revenue from fines is estimated to be not significant.  
• Any increase in court cases can be accommodated within existing judicial resources.  
 
 
CERTIFICATION: 
 
 The information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 
   
Bojan Savic, Executive Director