Tennessee Senate Bill SB0116

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Engrossed: 3/20/25
• Enrolled: 4/1/25
• Passed: 4/11/25
• Chaptered: 5/2/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 13, relative to audits of human resource agencies.

Impact

The proposed amendment involves the removal of a specific subdivision within the current law, which may streamline the auditing process. Such modifications could lead to a more simplified oversight mechanism, possibly reducing bureaucratic hurdles while ensuring that audits remain effective. This legislative initiative aims to ensure that human resources agencies are subject to rigorous checks and balances, thereby promoting transparency and reliability in their operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 116 (SB0116) seeks to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 13, specifically pertaining to the auditing processes of human resource agencies. The primary focus of this bill is to enhance the accountability and oversight of these agencies, ensuring that they comply with state regulations and operate efficiently. This legislative change is part of a broader effort to improve the governance of human resources within state-funded agencies and enhance public confidence in the functioning of these organizations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB0116 appears to be supportive, particularly among lawmakers interested in increasing governmental accountability. Advocates view this bill as a necessary step towards better management and oversight of public funds allocated to human resource agencies. This sentiment aligns with a wider political trend toward enhancing state agency efficiency and responsiveness to public needs.

Contention

While there seems to be broad support for the concept of increased audits and oversight, discussions may arise concerning the specifics of the amendments and what impact they may have on the agencies' operations. Some stakeholders might express concerns about the potential for increased oversight leading to additional administrative burdens, thereby complicating the agencies' ability to function efficiently. The ongoing debate could center around finding a balance between necessary oversight and operational flexibility for human resource agencies in Tennessee.