Tennessee Senate Bill SB0273

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Engrossed: 3/17/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 39-14-136 and Title 49, relative to student records.

Impact

The bill introduces a significant change to how academic records are managed within Tennessee schools. By allowing for the modification of grades based on retake programs, it aligns with educational practices aimed at fostering learning and resilience among students. This could positively influence retention rates and overall student success, as it encourages them to engage actively in their education by providing a safety net for academic failures. It shifts the focus from punitive measures for failing grades to a more supportive educational approach.

Summary

Senate Bill 273 (SB0273) amends Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Section 39-14-136 and Title 49, addressing issues related to student records and grades. The bill permits school employees to alter, create, or duplicate a student's grade in educational documents under specific circumstances. This situation arises particularly when a student retakes a course, exam, or assignment that allows them to earn credit. The intention behind this amendment is to support students who, after failure, are provided with opportunities to improve their academic standing without the stigma of a 'bad grade'.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB0273 appears to be largely positive, particularly among educators and advocates for student-focused policy changes. Proponents argue that the bill promotes educational growth and recognizes the challenges students face, thus enhancing their opportunities for success. There may be some concerns about the integrity of academic records and the potential for misuse, but the overarching attitude seems to favor flexibility and support for students in retaking courses. This reflects a broader trend in education towards accommodating diverse learning needs.

Contention

While the bill seeks to improve educational outcomes, it may raise concerns about grade inflation and the authenticity of academic records. Critics could argue that it might undermine academic standards if not monitored properly. There could be debates regarding the implications for accountability and the expectations of student performance. Ensuring that the processes for grade alterations are transparent and justifiable will be crucial to address potential contentions surrounding the bill.