Tennessee Senate Bill SB1445

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/25
• Chaptered: 4/23/25
• Passed: 4/23/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 519 of the Private Acts of 1911; and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to referenda in the Town of Rogersville.

Impact

The enactment of SB1445 would enhance local governmental practices in Rogersville by providing a structured way for citizens to participate in the decision-making process on critical issues. This approach may lead to a greater engagement of the electorate, allowing them to voice their concerns or support on matters deemed vital. The advisory nature of these referenda implies that while public input will be sought, it will not compel the government to follow through with constituents' preferences, which could lead to discussions about the efficacy of such a process in reflecting true voter sentiment in governance.

Summary

Senate Bill 1445 aims to amend Chapter 519 of the Private Acts of 1911, specifically pertaining to governance in the Town of Rogersville, Tennessee. The bill introduces provisions that allow the board of mayor and aldermen to direct the county election commission to place advisory questions on the ballot. These questions would be submitted to the voters on matters of significant public interest, enabling residents to express their opinions on various issues affecting their community. It is essential to note that the bill explicitly states that these referenda will be advisory in nature and nonbinding, meaning that responses will guide rather than dictate municipal decisions.

Contention

Potential points of contention surrounding SB1445 may arise from differing opinions on the usefulness and practicality of advisory referenda. Supporters could argue that this bill fosters democracy by encouraging more community involvement in governance and could bring transparency to how local leaders interpret constituents' needs. Conversely, opponents might view it as a superficial attempt at consultation that could dilute accountability and lead to public frustration if the outcomes are disregarded by elected officials. Additionally, the requirement of a two-thirds vote from the legislative body for the bill's enactment might spark debates about the accessibility and willingness of officials to embrace voter input.