Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1351 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 25, 2009      TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1351 by Vaught (Relating to the administration of the Juvenile Justice Case Management System.), As Introduced   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1351, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($3,779,198) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 25, 2009





  TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1351 by Vaught (Relating to the administration of the Juvenile Justice Case Management System.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1351 by Vaught (Relating to the administration of the Juvenile Justice Case Management System.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections 

 Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1351 by Vaught (Relating to the administration of the Juvenile Justice Case Management System.), As Introduced

HB1351 by Vaught (Relating to the administration of the Juvenile Justice Case Management System.), As Introduced

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1351, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($3,779,198) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1351, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($3,779,198) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2010 ($3,389,599)   2011 ($389,599)   2012 ($389,599)   2013 ($389,599)   2014 ($389,599)    


2010 ($3,389,599)
2011 ($389,599)
2012 ($389,599)
2013 ($389,599)
2014 ($389,599)

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009   2010 ($3,389,599) 4.0   2011 ($389,599) 4.0   2012 ($389,599) 4.0   2013 ($389,599) 4.0   2014 ($389,599) 4.0   

  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009   2010 ($3,389,599) 4.0   2011 ($389,599) 4.0   2012 ($389,599) 4.0   2013 ($389,599) 4.0   2014 ($389,599) 4.0  


2010 ($3,389,599) 4.0
2011 ($389,599) 4.0
2012 ($389,599) 4.0
2013 ($389,599) 4.0
2014 ($389,599) 4.0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend Section 58 of the Government Code from the Juvenile Probation Commission's (JPC) permissive participation in the creation and maintenance of a statewide juvenile case management system to required participation and assistance to counties. Currently, only Bexar, Dallas, and Tarrant counties are participating in and funding the total cost of the system. 

Methodology

This analysis includes a one-time cost for JPC's estimate of a reasonable buy-in for project development of the statewide system ($3 million), and costs for 4 FTEs, including benefits - one data base administrator and three systems support specialists - ($257,500); travel ($18,903); rent ($2,469); other operating expenses ($80,727); equipment ($18,000); and other costs ($12,000) for a total of $3,389,599 in the first year. Ongoing costs for salaries and wages, benefits, travel, rent, and other operating expenses total $389,599 per year. 

This analysis includes a one-time cost for JPC's estimate of a reasonable buy-in for project development of the statewide system ($3 million), and costs for 4 FTEs, including benefits - one data base administrator and three systems support specialists - ($257,500); travel ($18,903); rent ($2,469); other operating expenses ($80,727); equipment ($18,000); and other costs ($12,000) for a total of $3,389,599 in the first year. Ongoing costs for salaries and wages, benefits, travel, rent, and other operating expenses total $389,599 per year. 

Technology

This analysis assumes a technology impact of $3,000,000 for development of the system. 

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission

665 Juvenile Probation Commission

LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, GG, AI, TP

 JOB, ESi, GG, AI, TP