LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 24, 2009 TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1385 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the assessment of damages to a property owner from condemnation.), As Introduced No direct fiscal implication to the State is anticipated; however, if the special commissioners in a condemnation hearing find, based on the evidence allowed under provisions of the bill, that the state is liable for costs not previously considered, the state could incur an unknown additional cost associated with exercising the powers of eminent domain. The bill would amend the Property Code to require the special commissioners when assessing actual damages and for estimating injury or benefit to a property owner from a condemnation to admit evidence regarding the impact the condemnation would have on the property owner's standard of living if the owner has to move or move their farm as a result of the condemnation. The proposed change in statute would apply only to a condemnation proceeding in which the petition is filed on or after the effective date of the bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009. Although the requirements for the special commissioners to take the issues addressed in the bill into consideration would in and of itself have no direct fiscal implication to the state or to units of local government, a decision by the special commissioners that the government entity exercising eminent domain must compensate the property owner to restore the property owner's standard of living to the level that existed prior to the taking, could result in additional and possibly significant costs to the government entity. Those costs would depend on the number of property owners involved and the costs involved in restoring the standard of living. Local Government Impact No direct fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated; however, if the special commissioners in a condemnation hearing find, based on the evidence allowed under provisions of the bill, that the local government entity is liable for costs not previously considered, the entity could incur an unknown additional cost associated with exercising the powers of eminent domain. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, WK, SD, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 24, 2009
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1385 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the assessment of damages to a property owner from condemnation.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1385 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the assessment of damages to a property owner from condemnation.), As Introduced
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Chair, House Committee on Land & Resource Management
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1385 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the assessment of damages to a property owner from condemnation.), As Introduced
HB1385 by Davis, Yvonne (Relating to the assessment of damages to a property owner from condemnation.), As Introduced
No direct fiscal implication to the State is anticipated; however, if the special commissioners in a condemnation hearing find, based on the evidence allowed under provisions of the bill, that the state is liable for costs not previously considered, the state could incur an unknown additional cost associated with exercising the powers of eminent domain.
No direct fiscal implication to the State is anticipated; however, if the special commissioners in a condemnation hearing find, based on the evidence allowed under provisions of the bill, that the state is liable for costs not previously considered, the state could incur an unknown additional cost associated with exercising the powers of eminent domain.
The bill would amend the Property Code to require the special commissioners when assessing actual damages and for estimating injury or benefit to a property owner from a condemnation to admit evidence regarding the impact the condemnation would have on the property owner's standard of living if the owner has to move or move their farm as a result of the condemnation. The proposed change in statute would apply only to a condemnation proceeding in which the petition is filed on or after the effective date of the bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009. Although the requirements for the special commissioners to take the issues addressed in the bill into consideration would in and of itself have no direct fiscal implication to the state or to units of local government, a decision by the special commissioners that the government entity exercising eminent domain must compensate the property owner to restore the property owner's standard of living to the level that existed prior to the taking, could result in additional and possibly significant costs to the government entity. Those costs would depend on the number of property owners involved and the costs involved in restoring the standard of living.
The bill would amend the Property Code to require the special commissioners when assessing actual damages and for estimating injury or benefit to a property owner from a condemnation to admit evidence regarding the impact the condemnation would have on the property owner's standard of living if the owner has to move or move their farm as a result of the condemnation. The proposed change in statute would apply only to a condemnation proceeding in which the petition is filed on or after the effective date of the bill. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009.
Although the requirements for the special commissioners to take the issues addressed in the bill into consideration would in and of itself have no direct fiscal implication to the state or to units of local government, a decision by the special commissioners that the government entity exercising eminent domain must compensate the property owner to restore the property owner's standard of living to the level that existed prior to the taking, could result in additional and possibly significant costs to the government entity. Those costs would depend on the number of property owners involved and the costs involved in restoring the standard of living.
Local Government Impact
No direct fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated; however, if the special commissioners in a condemnation hearing find, based on the evidence allowed under provisions of the bill, that the local government entity is liable for costs not previously considered, the entity could incur an unknown additional cost associated with exercising the powers of eminent domain.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, WK, SD, DB
JOB, WK, SD, DB