Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1392 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 15, 2009      TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1392 by Leibowitz (Relating to required procedures regarding the ranking of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.), As Introduced    No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would provide a number of protections for physicians if a health benefit plan were to rank physicians.  The bill would require a health benefit plan that intends to rank physicians to disclose the standards or criteria to the physician before disseminating the ranking to the public.  The bill would establish due process rights for the physician to dispute the ranking, including a required notice of intent from the health benefit plan and the right to a hearing for a physician.  The bill would explicitly set the burden of proof on the health benefit plan.  The bill would permit a district court to issue a writ of injunction if a health benefit plan were to fail to meet those requirements.   It is not anticipated that these requirements would have any fiscal impact to the state.   Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:454 Department of Insurance   LBB Staff:  JOB, CL, JI, HC    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 15, 2009





  TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1392 by Leibowitz (Relating to required procedures regarding the ranking of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1392 by Leibowitz (Relating to required procedures regarding the ranking of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.), As Introduced

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health 

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1392 by Leibowitz (Relating to required procedures regarding the ranking of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.), As Introduced

HB1392 by Leibowitz (Relating to required procedures regarding the ranking of physicians by health benefit plan issuers.), As Introduced



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would provide a number of protections for physicians if a health benefit plan were to rank physicians.  The bill would require a health benefit plan that intends to rank physicians to disclose the standards or criteria to the physician before disseminating the ranking to the public.  The bill would establish due process rights for the physician to dispute the ranking, including a required notice of intent from the health benefit plan and the right to a hearing for a physician.  The bill would explicitly set the burden of proof on the health benefit plan.  The bill would permit a district court to issue a writ of injunction if a health benefit plan were to fail to meet those requirements.   It is not anticipated that these requirements would have any fiscal impact to the state.  

The bill would provide a number of protections for physicians if a health benefit plan were to rank physicians.  The bill would require a health benefit plan that intends to rank physicians to disclose the standards or criteria to the physician before disseminating the ranking to the public.  The bill would establish due process rights for the physician to dispute the ranking, including a required notice of intent from the health benefit plan and the right to a hearing for a physician.  The bill would explicitly set the burden of proof on the health benefit plan.  The bill would permit a district court to issue a writ of injunction if a health benefit plan were to fail to meet those requirements.

 

It is not anticipated that these requirements would have any fiscal impact to the state.  

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 454 Department of Insurance

454 Department of Insurance

LBB Staff: JOB, CL, JI, HC

 JOB, CL, JI, HC