LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 27, 2009 TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1425 by Lewis (Relating to the determination of the population of a county required to develop a juvenile justice alternative education program.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. Section 1 of the bill would amend Section 37.011, Education Code, by adding Subsection (a-1) to stipulate that the county's population would be determined by the 2000 Federal Census for the purpose of determining whether a county's population was large enough to require the development of a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP). Section 2 of the bill would require a juvenile court to modify the conditions of probation or deferred prosecution for a youth ordered to attend a JJAEP in a county that was not required to operate a JJAEP if the county discontinues operation of the JJAEP. Section 3 of the bill would make the bill apply beginning with the 20092010 school year. Section 4 of the bill would make the bill effective immediately if passed with the necessary votes, or September 1, 2009. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:665 Juvenile Probation Commission, 701 Central Education Agency LBB Staff: JOB, JSp, GG, AI
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 27, 2009
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB1425 by Lewis (Relating to the determination of the population of a county required to develop a juvenile justice alternative education program.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1425 by Lewis (Relating to the determination of the population of a county required to develop a juvenile justice alternative education program.), As Introduced
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
Honorable Rob Eissler, Chair, House Committee on Public Education
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1425 by Lewis (Relating to the determination of the population of a county required to develop a juvenile justice alternative education program.), As Introduced
HB1425 by Lewis (Relating to the determination of the population of a county required to develop a juvenile justice alternative education program.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Section 1 of the bill would amend Section 37.011, Education Code, by adding Subsection (a-1) to stipulate that the county's population would be determined by the 2000 Federal Census for the purpose of determining whether a county's population was large enough to require the development of a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP). Section 2 of the bill would require a juvenile court to modify the conditions of probation or deferred prosecution for a youth ordered to attend a JJAEP in a county that was not required to operate a JJAEP if the county discontinues operation of the JJAEP. Section 3 of the bill would make the bill apply beginning with the 20092010 school year. Section 4 of the bill would make the bill effective immediately if passed with the necessary votes, or September 1, 2009.
Section 1 of the bill would amend Section 37.011, Education Code, by adding Subsection (a-1) to stipulate that the county's population would be determined by the 2000 Federal Census for the purpose of determining whether a county's population was large enough to require the development of a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP). Section 2 of the bill would require a juvenile court to modify the conditions of probation or deferred prosecution for a youth ordered to attend a JJAEP in a county that was not required to operate a JJAEP if the county discontinues operation of the JJAEP. Section 3 of the bill would make the bill apply beginning with the 20092010 school year. Section 4 of the bill would make the bill effective immediately if passed with the necessary votes, or September 1, 2009.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 665 Juvenile Probation Commission, 701 Central Education Agency
665 Juvenile Probation Commission, 701 Central Education Agency
LBB Staff: JOB, JSp, GG, AI
JOB, JSp, GG, AI