Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1647 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 9, 2009      TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1647 by Menendez (Relating to certain judicial findings required before a court may order a person to receive extended outpatient mental health services.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would allow judges or juries to place persons on extended outpatient commitments if they have received a total of 60 days of court-ordered inpatient mental health services in the past two years. Currently the 60 days must be consecutive and within the past year.    The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) estimates that there will only be about 10 persons per year eligible for this type of commitment. The bill would allow DSHS to consolidate multiple temporary outpatient commitment hearings into a single extended commitment hearing. The agency indicates no quantifiable cost or savings to the state. Local Government Impact No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:537 State Health Services, Department of   LBB Staff:  JOB, CL, BM, LR    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 9, 2009





  TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1647 by Menendez (Relating to certain judicial findings required before a court may order a person to receive extended outpatient mental health services.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1647 by Menendez (Relating to certain judicial findings required before a court may order a person to receive extended outpatient mental health services.), As Introduced

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health 

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, House Committee on Public Health 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1647 by Menendez (Relating to certain judicial findings required before a court may order a person to receive extended outpatient mental health services.), As Introduced

HB1647 by Menendez (Relating to certain judicial findings required before a court may order a person to receive extended outpatient mental health services.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would allow judges or juries to place persons on extended outpatient commitments if they have received a total of 60 days of court-ordered inpatient mental health services in the past two years. Currently the 60 days must be consecutive and within the past year.    The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) estimates that there will only be about 10 persons per year eligible for this type of commitment. The bill would allow DSHS to consolidate multiple temporary outpatient commitment hearings into a single extended commitment hearing. The agency indicates no quantifiable cost or savings to the state.

The bill would allow judges or juries to place persons on extended outpatient commitments if they have received a total of 60 days of court-ordered inpatient mental health services in the past two years. Currently the 60 days must be consecutive and within the past year. 

 

The Department of State Health Services (DSHS) estimates that there will only be about 10 persons per year eligible for this type of commitment. The bill would allow DSHS to consolidate multiple temporary outpatient commitment hearings into a single extended commitment hearing. The agency indicates no quantifiable cost or savings to the state.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 537 State Health Services, Department of

537 State Health Services, Department of

LBB Staff: JOB, CL, BM, LR

 JOB, CL, BM, LR