Texas House Bill HB1756

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the functions performed by the comptroller in connection with applications and agreements under the Texas Economic Development Act.

Impact

The implications of HB 1756 on state laws are significant. By formalizing and clarifying the reporting process, the bill is poised to improve oversight regarding economic development agreements. This measure could lead to a more informed legislative environment, facilitating better decision-making based on concrete data. Furthermore, the requirement for school districts to assist in data collection and report submission emphasizes the collaborative nature of state-local interactions in economic development efforts.

Summary

House Bill 1756 aims to modify the functions performed by the comptroller in relation to applications and agreements under the Texas Economic Development Act. The bill introduces amendments to the reporting requirements for the comptroller, mandating a comprehensive assessment of agreements entered into that provide tax limitations on appraised values. One of the key features is the inclusion of metrics such as the actual number of jobs created, median wages, and the total dollar amounts of investments, enhancing accountability and transparency in the economic impact evaluations associated with these agreements.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the introduction of HB 1756 signifies a push towards a more accountable structure for assessing the effectiveness of economic development initiatives under the Texas Economic Development Act. Its focus on rigorous data collection and transparent reporting could reshape how future agreements are evaluated, while addressing local agencies' contributions to state-wide development goals.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 1756 include potential disagreements about the adequacy of the metrics specified for evaluating agreements. Critics may argue that the provided metrics do not encompass all facets of economic impact, while supporters contend that this structured approach is necessary for enhancing public understanding of how tax limitations affect job creation and community development. Additionally, varying interpretations of the roles of the comptroller and local governments in these agreements might surface during discussions.