Texas House Bill HB1841

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/4/09
• Voted on by House: 5/12/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/30/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the XS Ranch Municipal Utility District; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly affect local governance structures and financial regulations surrounding the establishment of municipal utility districts in Texas. Specifically, it allows for the imposition of an ad valorem tax and the issuance of bonds, subject to voter approval, to fund infrastructure improvements. The legislation aims to ensure that the district can effectively manage its financial obligations while providing essential services to its residents. Moreover, it incorporates provisions for compliance with municipal consent, emphasizing the need for local governmental coordination in its operation.

Summary

House Bill 1841 seeks to establish the XS Ranch Municipal Utility District, which would provide essential utilities and infrastructure development in a designated area. The district will have the authority to impose taxes specifically to fund its operations and will be empowered to issue bonds to finance infrastructure projects, thereby facilitating the improvement, operation, and maintenance of local roads and drainage systems. This bill aims to enhance service delivery in developing regions, focusing on transportation and public utility needs.

Contention

While proponents of HB1841 argue that establishing the XS Ranch Municipal Utility District is necessary for managing local infrastructure and utilities, concerns have been raised regarding the empowerment of such districts to exercise eminent domain, even in limited circumstances. These powers could lead to conflicts with established property rights, particularly if residents or landowners feel inadequately consulted. As such, the balance between facilitating community development and protecting private property interests remains a point of contention among stakeholders.