LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 12, 2009 TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2063 by Callegari (Relating to the enforcement of rules by a groundwater conservation district.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Section 36.102 of the Water Code to specify that in an enforcement action taken by a groundwater conservation district against any person that is a governmental entity for a violation of district rules, the limits on the amount of fees, costs, and penalties that a district may impose under certain statutes would constitute a limit on the governmental entity's liability for the violation. The Savings Provisions in Section 311.031(a), Government Code, would apply to the proposed changes to Section 36.102, Water Code. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009. A state or local governmental entity that violates district rules would be protected from excessive revenue losses as a result of the proposed change in statute. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that a state or local governmental entity would not violate the rules of a groundwater conservation district; however, if a violation were to occur, it is assumed there would not be numerous violations and that the fees, costs, and penalties could be absorbed within existing resources. Absent the proposed limits, a governmental entity could otherwise incur higher costs. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, SD, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 12, 2009
TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2063 by Callegari (Relating to the enforcement of rules by a groundwater conservation district.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2063 by Callegari (Relating to the enforcement of rules by a groundwater conservation district.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources
Honorable Kip Averitt, Chair, Senate Committee on Natural Resources
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2063 by Callegari (Relating to the enforcement of rules by a groundwater conservation district.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
HB2063 by Callegari (Relating to the enforcement of rules by a groundwater conservation district.), Committee Report 2nd House, Substituted
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Section 36.102 of the Water Code to specify that in an enforcement action taken by a groundwater conservation district against any person that is a governmental entity for a violation of district rules, the limits on the amount of fees, costs, and penalties that a district may impose under certain statutes would constitute a limit on the governmental entity's liability for the violation. The Savings Provisions in Section 311.031(a), Government Code, would apply to the proposed changes to Section 36.102, Water Code. The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009. A state or local governmental entity that violates district rules would be protected from excessive revenue losses as a result of the proposed change in statute. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that a state or local governmental entity would not violate the rules of a groundwater conservation district; however, if a violation were to occur, it is assumed there would not be numerous violations and that the fees, costs, and penalties could be absorbed within existing resources. Absent the proposed limits, a governmental entity could otherwise incur higher costs.
The bill would amend Section 36.102 of the Water Code to specify that in an enforcement action taken by a groundwater conservation district against any person that is a governmental entity for a violation of district rules, the limits on the amount of fees, costs, and penalties that a district may impose under certain statutes would constitute a limit on the governmental entity's liability for the violation.
The Savings Provisions in Section 311.031(a), Government Code, would apply to the proposed changes to Section 36.102, Water Code.
The bill would take effect immediately if it were to receive the required two-thirds vote in each house; otherwise, it would take effect September 1, 2009.
A state or local governmental entity that violates district rules would be protected from excessive revenue losses as a result of the proposed change in statute. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that a state or local governmental entity would not violate the rules of a groundwater conservation district; however, if a violation were to occur, it is assumed there would not be numerous violations and that the fees, costs, and penalties could be absorbed within existing resources. Absent the proposed limits, a governmental entity could otherwise incur higher costs.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, SZ, SD, DB
JOB, SZ, SD, DB