Texas House Bill HB2075

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/23/09

Caption

Relating to limitations on the number of courses that students may drop under certain circumstances at certain public institutions of higher education.

Impact

The implementation of HB 2075 will lead to changes in state educational policies and procedures at public universities and colleges. Specifically, it will streamline how institutions handle course drops by enforcing a capped limit. Institutions will also need to develop policies that may allow for fewer course drops under certain conditions, ultimately promoting accountability among students. This approach seeks to enhance the overall educational outcomes by encouraging students to remain committed to their courses.

Summary

House Bill 2075 addresses the limitations on the number of courses that students can drop at public institutions of higher education under specific conditions. The bill stipulates that an undergraduate student may drop a maximum of six courses without incurring a grade or academic penalty, including any courses dropped at previously attended institutions. This limitation aims to encourage students to make considered decisions regarding their course loads while also promoting academic rigor and responsibility.

Conclusion

Ultimately, HB 2075 represents a legislative effort to balance the need for academic integrity with the flexibility necessary for student success in higher education. The dynamics of its implementation will likely continue to evolve as institutions adapt their policies to comply with the new guidelines and as students navigate the challenges of their educational endeavors.

Contention

The bill may generate debate around issues of student autonomy and institutional control. Supporters argue that having a maximum limit on course drops can prevent students from abusing this option, thus promoting a stronger educational environment. However, critics may contend that this restricts students' ability to make necessary adjustments in response to personal circumstances, such as health issues or family responsibilities. The provisions allowing for additional drops under extenuating circumstances, such as severe illness, are intended to mitigate this concern, but the efficacy and clarity of such provisions could still be points of contention.