Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB2510 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    81R8207 SJM-D
 By: Jones H.B. No. 2510


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the admissibility of a statement made by an accused in a
 criminal case.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1. Section 2, Article 38.22, Code of Criminal
 Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 2. No [written] statement made by an accused as a
 result of custodial interrogation is admissible as evidence against
 him in any criminal proceeding unless it is shown [on the face of
 the statement] that:
 (a) the accused, prior to making the statement, either
 received from a magistrate the warning provided in Article 15.17
 [of this code] or received from the person to whom the statement is
 made a warning that:
 (1) he has the right to remain silent and not make any
 statement at all and that any statement he makes may be used against
 him at his trial;
 (2) any statement he makes may be used as evidence
 against him in court;
 (3) he has the right to have a lawyer present to advise
 him prior to and during any questioning;
 (4) if he is unable to employ a lawyer, he has the
 right to have a lawyer appointed to advise him prior to and during
 any questioning; and
 (5) he has the right to terminate the interview at any
 time; and
 (b) the accused, prior to and during the making of the
 statement, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the
 rights set out in the warning prescribed by Subsection (a) [of this
 section].
 SECTION 2. Sections 3(a), (c), and (d), Article 38.22, Code
 of Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:
 (a) An [No] oral or sign language statement of an accused
 made as the [a] result of custodial interrogation is not [shall be]
 admissible against the accused in a criminal proceeding unless:
 (1) the statement is made in compliance with the
 requirements of Section 2;
 (2)  the oral statement was heard or the sign language
 statement was witnessed by two or more persons;
 (3)  at least two of the persons described by
 Subdivision (2) have prepared a written memorandum of the contents
 of the statement within 48 hours after the time the statement was
 made, including the date, time, and place the statement was made;
 and
 (4)  the persons who prepared a written memorandum
 under Subdivision (3) swear before a magistrate that the date,
 time, and place of the memorandum are correct and that the
 memorandum accurately reflects the statement made by the accused
 [an electronic recording, which may include motion picture, video
 tape, or other visual recording, is made of the statement;
 [(2) prior to the statement but during the recording the
 accused is given the warning in Subsection (a) of Section 2 above
 and the accused knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives
 any rights set out in the warning;
 [(3) the recording device was capable of making an
 accurate recording, the operator was competent, and the recording
 is accurate and has not been altered;
 [(4) all voices on the recording are identified; and
 [(5) not later than the 20th day before the date of the
 proceeding, the attorney representing the defendant is provided
 with a true, complete, and accurate copy of all recordings of the
 defendant made under this article].
 (c) Subsection (a) does [of this section shall] not apply to
 any statement which contains assertions of facts or circumstances
 that are found to be true and which conduce to establish the guilt
 of the accused, such as the finding of secreted or stolen property
 or the instrument with which he states the offense was committed.
 (d) If the accused is a deaf person, the accused's statement
 under Subsection (a) [Section 2 or Section 3(a) of this article] is
 not admissible against the accused unless the warning in Section 2
 [of this article] is interpreted to the deaf person by an
 interpreter who is qualified and sworn as provided in Article 38.31
 [of this code].
 SECTION 3. Sections 3(b) and (e), Article 38.22, Code of
 Criminal Procedure, are repealed.
 SECTION 4. The change in law made by this Act applies only
 to a statement made by an accused on or after the effective date of
 this Act. A statement made by an accused before the effective date
 of this Act is governed by the law in effect at the time the
 statement was made, and the former law is continued in effect for
 that purpose.
 SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.