LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 9, 2009 TO: Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2515 by Smith, Todd (Relating to the minimum dollar amount for certain requirements to apply to certain public contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. Current law in the Government Code requires a governmental entity to require a payment bond from a prime contractor for a public work contract in excess of $25,000. The bill would amend the Government Code to require this payment bond if the governmental entity is not a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport, or if the contract is in excess of $50,000 and the governmental entity is a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport. Current law in the Local Government Code allows the governing body of a municipality to grant general authority to an administrative official to approve a change order that involves a decrease or an increase of $25,000 or less. The bill would raise the limit to $50,000. The agencies contacted indicate that the bill would have no fiscal implication to the State. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 601 Department of Transportation, 696 Department of Criminal Justice, 701 Central Education Agency, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, SD, PJK, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 9, 2009
TO: Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2515 by Smith, Todd (Relating to the minimum dollar amount for certain requirements to apply to certain public contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
TO: Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2515 by Smith, Todd (Relating to the minimum dollar amount for certain requirements to apply to certain public contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
Honorable Burt R. Solomons, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2515 by Smith, Todd (Relating to the minimum dollar amount for certain requirements to apply to certain public contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
HB2515 by Smith, Todd (Relating to the minimum dollar amount for certain requirements to apply to certain public contracts.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
Current law in the Government Code requires a governmental entity to require a payment bond from a prime contractor for a public work contract in excess of $25,000. The bill would amend the Government Code to require this payment bond if the governmental entity is not a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport, or if the contract is in excess of $50,000 and the governmental entity is a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport. Current law in the Local Government Code allows the governing body of a municipality to grant general authority to an administrative official to approve a change order that involves a decrease or an increase of $25,000 or less. The bill would raise the limit to $50,000. The agencies contacted indicate that the bill would have no fiscal implication to the State.
Current law in the Government Code requires a governmental entity to require a payment bond from a prime contractor for a public work contract in excess of $25,000. The bill would amend the Government Code to require this payment bond if the governmental entity is not a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport, or if the contract is in excess of $50,000 and the governmental entity is a municipality or joint board for a county or municipal airport.
Current law in the Local Government Code allows the governing body of a municipality to grant general authority to an administrative official to approve a change order that involves a decrease or an increase of $25,000 or less. The bill would raise the limit to $50,000.
The agencies contacted indicate that the bill would have no fiscal implication to the State.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 601 Department of Transportation, 696 Department of Criminal Justice, 701 Central Education Agency, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
303 Facilities Commission, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 529 Health and Human Services Commission, 601 Department of Transportation, 696 Department of Criminal Justice, 701 Central Education Agency, 710 Texas A&M University System Administrative and General Offices, 720 The University of Texas System Administration
LBB Staff: JOB, KJG, SD, PJK, DB
JOB, KJG, SD, PJK, DB