LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION Revision 1 April 14, 2009 TO: Honorable Dan Branch, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2518 by Menendez (Relating to authorization by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for certain public junior colleges to offer baccalaureate degree programs.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2518, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($8,000,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
Revision 1
April 14, 2009
Revision 1
Revision 1
TO: Honorable Dan Branch, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2518 by Menendez (Relating to authorization by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for certain public junior colleges to offer baccalaureate degree programs.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Dan Branch, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2518 by Menendez (Relating to authorization by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for certain public junior colleges to offer baccalaureate degree programs.), As Introduced
Honorable Dan Branch, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education
Honorable Dan Branch, Chair, House Committee on Higher Education
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2518 by Menendez (Relating to authorization by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for certain public junior colleges to offer baccalaureate degree programs.), As Introduced
HB2518 by Menendez (Relating to authorization by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for certain public junior colleges to offer baccalaureate degree programs.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2518, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($8,000,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2518, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($8,000,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2010 ($4,000,000) 2011 ($4,000,000) 2012 ($1,320,000) 2013 ($1,320,000) 2014 ($1,320,000)
2010 ($4,000,000)
2011 ($4,000,000)
2012 ($1,320,000)
2013 ($1,320,000)
2014 ($1,320,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2010 ($4,000,000) 2011 ($4,000,000) 2012 ($1,320,000) 2013 ($1,320,000) 2014 ($1,320,000)
Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 2010 ($4,000,000) 2011 ($4,000,000) 2012 ($1,320,000) 2013 ($1,320,000) 2014 ($1,320,000)
2010 ($4,000,000)
2011 ($4,000,000)
2012 ($1,320,000)
2013 ($1,320,000)
2014 ($1,320,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would direct the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to authorize the creation of an undetermined number of Bachelor of Applied Technology (B.A.T.) degree programs at certain community college districts (i.e. those districts currently offering a degree program in Fire Science). The THECB estimates the bill could result in up to eight community college districts choosing to offer a new B.A.T. program.
The bill would direct the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to authorize the creation of an undetermined number of Bachelor of Applied Technology (B.A.T.) degree programs at certain community college districts (i.e. those districts currently offering a degree program in Fire Science). The THECB estimates the bill could result in up to eight community college districts choosing to offer a new B.A.T. program.
Methodology
The bill would not require a state contribution to fund the B.A.T. programs authorized by the bill. However, in the past, the state has provided two sorts of support for the three existing pilot B.A.T. programs: start-up funding and formula funding. Start-up Funding: Using the THECB's assumption that eight districts would opt to offer new B.A.T. programs, and assuming $1.0 million in start-up funding is provided by the state in the fiscal year 2010-11 biennium, the start-up costs would total $4.0 million. Formula Funding: Using current formula contribution levels for the three existing B.A.T. programs (averaging about $165,000 per year per district) as an estimated measure of the annual formula contribution cost for the eight new B.A.T. programs, the formula funding costs would be about $1.32 million per year, starting in fiscal year 2012.
The bill would not require a state contribution to fund the B.A.T. programs authorized by the bill.
However, in the past, the state has provided two sorts of support for the three existing pilot B.A.T. programs: start-up funding and formula funding.
Start-up Funding: Using the THECB's assumption that eight districts would opt to offer new B.A.T. programs, and assuming $1.0 million in start-up funding is provided by the state in the fiscal year 2010-11 biennium, the start-up costs would total $4.0 million.
Formula Funding: Using current formula contribution levels for the three existing B.A.T. programs (averaging about $165,000 per year per district) as an estimated measure of the annual formula contribution cost for the eight new B.A.T. programs, the formula funding costs would be about $1.32 million per year, starting in fiscal year 2012.
Local Government Impact
If a local community college district is authorized to offer a new BAT program, the district would, unless the state provides assistance, bear the initial costs of starting up the new program, until such a time when the state may provide formula contributions for the new program.
Source Agencies: 781 Higher Education Coordinating Board
781 Higher Education Coordinating Board
LBB Staff: JOB, KK, RT, JAW
JOB, KK, RT, JAW