Texas House Bill HB2548

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/14/09
• Voted on by House: 5/7/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/18/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/21/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/23/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to membership of certain advisory bodies to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation.

Impact

If enacted, HB2548 will modify the existing composition of advisory boards across various sectors such as beauty, auctioneering, and property tax consulting. By increasing the representation of public members on these boards, the bill is expected to create a regulatory environment that is more responsive to the public's needs and concerns. As the advisory boards play a crucial role in advising the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation on policy and administrative issues, this amendment could lead to a shift in how regulations are proposed and reviewed, potentially fostering a more inclusive approach to policy-making.

Summary

House Bill 2548 proposes amendments to enhance the membership structure of several advisory bodies within the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. The bill specifically aims to increase the number of members on these boards to better represent the interests of various stakeholders involved in the regulation of certain professions. Key changes would include the appointment of additional public members, which is intended to provide a more balanced perspective and greater transparency in decision-making processes. This move reflects a growing trend in governance to involve citizens more directly in regulatory practices.

Contention

While there is overarching support for increased public representation, some stakeholders may view these changes as unnecessary or burdensome. Concerns might arise from regulated industries regarding the capability of public members to understand complex technical issues related to their fields. Additionally, existing board members may feel that their expertise could be diluted with the inclusion of too many public members. Thus, balancing the need for expert advice with increased public oversight could be a point of contention as the bill moves through the legislative process.