Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB2609 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            March 25, 2009      TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2609 by Miller, Doug (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the offense of criminal trespass.), As Introduced    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Penal Code regarding offense levels for the offense of criminal trespass. Depending on the circumstances, the offense would be a Class C, Class B, or Class A misdemeanor. The bill would also add as a criminal trespass offense the act of entering or remaining on residential land of another and, having been previously notified that entering the land was prohibited or told to depart, fails to comply. It is assumed that any costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue collected as a result of fines imposed would depend on the number of cases prosecuted and the discretion of the judge in imposing the amount of fine. Local Government Impact In addition to costs and revenue described above, counties could incur costs associated with confining offenders in the county jail as part of the sentence imposed. However, depending on the number of cases for which jail time is imposed, it is assumed that costs could be absorbed within existing resources.    Source Agencies:   LBB Staff:  JOB, ESi, DB    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 25, 2009





  TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB2609 by Miller, Doug (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the offense of criminal trespass.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2609 by Miller, Doug (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the offense of criminal trespass.), As Introduced

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2609 by Miller, Doug (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the offense of criminal trespass.), As Introduced

HB2609 by Miller, Doug (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the offense of criminal trespass.), As Introduced



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Penal Code regarding offense levels for the offense of criminal trespass. Depending on the circumstances, the offense would be a Class C, Class B, or Class A misdemeanor. The bill would also add as a criminal trespass offense the act of entering or remaining on residential land of another and, having been previously notified that entering the land was prohibited or told to depart, fails to comply. It is assumed that any costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue collected as a result of fines imposed would depend on the number of cases prosecuted and the discretion of the judge in imposing the amount of fine.

The bill would amend the Penal Code regarding offense levels for the offense of criminal trespass. Depending on the circumstances, the offense would be a Class C, Class B, or Class A misdemeanor. The bill would also add as a criminal trespass offense the act of entering or remaining on residential land of another and, having been previously notified that entering the land was prohibited or told to depart, fails to comply.

It is assumed that any costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue collected as a result of fines imposed would depend on the number of cases prosecuted and the discretion of the judge in imposing the amount of fine.

Local Government Impact

In addition to costs and revenue described above, counties could incur costs associated with confining offenders in the county jail as part of the sentence imposed. However, depending on the number of cases for which jail time is imposed, it is assumed that costs could be absorbed within existing resources.

Source Agencies:



LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, DB

 JOB, ESi, DB