LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 20, 2009 TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2732 by Eissler (Relating to the regulation of barking dogs by certain counties as a nuisance.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would authorize a county with a population of 275,000 or more to regulate as a public nuisance the barking or other noise made by a dog outdoors on premises in a neighborhood. Local Government Impact Costs of enforcement or any revenue gain from imposition of fines is not expected to be significant. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: LBB Staff: JOB, DB
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 20, 2009
TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2732 by Eissler (Relating to the regulation of barking dogs by certain counties as a nuisance.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2732 by Eissler (Relating to the regulation of barking dogs by certain counties as a nuisance.), As Introduced
Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2732 by Eissler (Relating to the regulation of barking dogs by certain counties as a nuisance.), As Introduced
HB2732 by Eissler (Relating to the regulation of barking dogs by certain counties as a nuisance.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would authorize a county with a population of 275,000 or more to regulate as a public nuisance the barking or other noise made by a dog outdoors on premises in a neighborhood.
Local Government Impact
Costs of enforcement or any revenue gain from imposition of fines is not expected to be significant. No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Costs of enforcement or any revenue gain from imposition of fines is not expected to be significant.
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies:
LBB Staff: JOB, DB
JOB, DB