LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 22, 2009 TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2921 by King, Susan (Relating to a requirement that state schools provide certain services to persons residing in the communities in which the schools are located.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require a state school to provide nonresidential services that are comparable to the services provided to residents of the state school to persons with mental retardation who reside in the community in which the school is located. The bill would require a state school to provide nonresidential services only to a person with mental retardation who would qualify for those services if the person resided in the state school and if the state school is reimbursed. The bill would require provision of the following nonresidential services: behavior treatment services, skills training, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and vocational training. The bill would allow a state school to contract with the local mental retardation authority or community provider for the state school to provide the services. The bill would require the Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission to prescribe appropriate charges for the services if the state school does not receive reimbursement for the services from a third party, including a local, state, or federal program. The Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) could not estimate how many persons would receive services provided by the bill. This analysis assumes that depending on the number of clients receiving services, DADS could incur additional staffing and other costs which would be offset by the new revenue assuming the fees are set to cover expenditures related to the services provided. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies:539 Aging and Disability Services, Department of LBB Staff: JOB, CL, JI, LL
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 22, 2009
TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB2921 by King, Susan (Relating to a requirement that state schools provide certain services to persons residing in the communities in which the schools are located.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2921 by King, Susan (Relating to a requirement that state schools provide certain services to persons residing in the communities in which the schools are located.), As Introduced
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Honorable Patrick M. Rose, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2921 by King, Susan (Relating to a requirement that state schools provide certain services to persons residing in the communities in which the schools are located.), As Introduced
HB2921 by King, Susan (Relating to a requirement that state schools provide certain services to persons residing in the communities in which the schools are located.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would require a state school to provide nonresidential services that are comparable to the services provided to residents of the state school to persons with mental retardation who reside in the community in which the school is located. The bill would require a state school to provide nonresidential services only to a person with mental retardation who would qualify for those services if the person resided in the state school and if the state school is reimbursed. The bill would require provision of the following nonresidential services: behavior treatment services, skills training, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and vocational training. The bill would allow a state school to contract with the local mental retardation authority or community provider for the state school to provide the services. The bill would require the Executive Commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission to prescribe appropriate charges for the services if the state school does not receive reimbursement for the services from a third party, including a local, state, or federal program. The Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) could not estimate how many persons would receive services provided by the bill. This analysis assumes that depending on the number of clients receiving services, DADS could incur additional staffing and other costs which would be offset by the new revenue assuming the fees are set to cover expenditures related to the services provided.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: 539 Aging and Disability Services, Department of
539 Aging and Disability Services, Department of
LBB Staff: JOB, CL, JI, LL
JOB, CL, JI, LL