Texas House Bill HB2989

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/4/09
• Voted on by House: 5/14/09

Caption

Relating to the reactivation of a peace officer license for certain peace officers.

Impact

By allowing the reactivation of licenses without the burden of re-examination, this legislation is anticipated to enhance the ability of retired officers to return to active duty if desired. The bill stipulates that retired peace officers or those holding an advanced proficiency certificate can reactivate their licenses by completing required continuing education instead of retaking any examination mandated by the commission. This is expected to result in a more efficient and flexible reentry process into law enforcement careers absent the complexities of traditional re-examination requirements.

Overall

This legislation reflects a broader trend of addressing workforce needs within law enforcement by facilitating the return of veteran officers into active service. As the demand for law enforcement personnel continues, particularly in certain areas, HB2989 could play a crucial role in shaping staffing policies while balancing the need for both experience and oversight within law enforcement agencies.

Summary

House Bill 2989 focuses on the reactivation of peace officer licenses specifically for retired peace officers and those who hold certain proficiency certificates. The bill aims to amend Section 1701.3161 of the Occupations Code to streamline the process for these individuals to regain their licenses after a period of inactivity. A retired peace officer is defined as someone who has served in this capacity and is either eligible or ineligible for retirement due to specific circumstances related to their employment, such as injuries sustained while on duty.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB2989 is its potential impact on the overall quality and readiness of reactivated peace officers. While proponents argue that it eases the transition back into service for experienced former officers, critics may express concerns about the adequacy of continuing education as a substitute for comprehensive re-evaluation of skills and knowledge. Additionally, the possibility that individuals with revoked licenses may be excluded from reactivation could raise questions about the criteria for eligibility and the overarching accountability for law enforcement professionals.