Texas House Bill HB3072

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/24/09
• Voted on by House: 5/5/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/31/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the transfer of municipal property to economic development corporations by certain municipalities.

Impact

The passage of HB 3072 could significantly alter how municipalities manage their properties and foster economic development. By enabling these local governments to bypass certain established procedures, the bill empowers them to quickly allocate land and resources to economic development initiatives. This could lead to expedited projects aimed at promoting public purposes, as the economic development corporations would be required to use the property primarily for such ends. However, if such uses fail, the property rights would revert back to the municipality, ensuring that land intended for public benefit does not fall into disuse or private hands improperly.

Summary

House Bill 3072 proposes amendments to the Local Government Code regarding the transfer of municipal property to economic development corporations. Specifically, this bill applies to municipalities with populations of 20,000 or less and allows them to transfer real property or interests in real property to economic development corporations without adhering to the conventional notice and bidding requirements currently mandated by law. This change is intended to streamline the process and encourage economic growth in smaller municipalities by making it easier for local governments to engage with development corporations.

Contention

While the bill aims to enhance local economic development, it may also spark discussions about transparency and accountability within local governance. Critics of such measures often express concerns over the potential for misuse or lack of oversight when bypassing standard bidding processes. There may be fears that without these requirements, opportunities for abuse could arise, where properties could be transferred without adequate public scrutiny. Thus, the balance between facilitating economic development and ensuring responsible governance could be a notable point of contention in the legislative discussions surrounding the bill.