Texas House Bill HB3095

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/28/09
• Voted on by House: 5/11/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/23/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/31/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the use of a parking space or area designated specifically for persons with disabilities.

Impact

The impact of HB 3095 is primarily on state laws that govern the distribution and enforcement of accessible parking. By defining the requirements for disabled parking placards and the conditions under which they can be seized, the bill streamlines the administrative processes for local governments and law enforcement officers. This change is positioned to improve the parking experience for individuals with disabilities, ensuring that designated spaces are reserved for those who need them most. Additionally, the update reinforces the penalties for violations, which could function as a deterrent to illegal usage of disabled parking spots.

Summary

House Bill 3095 addresses the regulations surrounding the use of designated parking spaces for persons with disabilities in Texas. The bill amends the Transportation Code, particularly Section 681.002, to stipulate specific requirements for disabled parking placards, which must now be two-sided and contain certain identification features. This aims to enhance the visibility and usability of parking spots for disabled individuals, ensuring that they are adequately marked for enforcement purposes. Provisions in the bill also call for modifications to how parking regulations and violations are administratively handled, including increased penalties for non-compliance with these regulations.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 3095 revolves around the implementation and enforcement of the updated guidelines. Critics have voiced concerns about the adequacy of resources available to enforce the stricter regulations and fear that the increased fines may disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who may inadvertently park in the wrong spaces. Furthermore, discussions around the balance between ensuring access and burdening public property owners with compliance and enforcement are central to the debate. Supporters argue that the modifications are essential to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities and ensure equitable access to public spaces.