Texas House Bill HB3323

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to storage of electronic fingerprint records and access to criminal history record information.

Impact

The implications of HB 3323 may significantly affect the operational procedures of state agencies that handle criminal history requests. By not requiring individuals to submit a new fingerprint card or record if they have done so within the prior two years, the bill aims to reduce redundancy and alleviate the burden on individuals seeking their records. This change could enhance efficiency and accessibility in obtaining one’s criminal history, potentially benefiting those involved in employment and licensing processes which often necessitate background checks.

Summary

House Bill 3323 is focused on the management and dissemination of electronic fingerprint records and criminal history record information in Texas. This bill amends the Government Code to establish that the department responsible for criminal records must maintain electronic fingerprint records for individuals who have requested a criminal history review. Importantly, it empowers individuals to authorize the department to relay their updated criminal history information to entitled parties, including information sourced from federal agencies. The intent is to streamline the process of accessing and sharing crucial background information while ensuring the privacy and security of individuals' records.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 3323 represents a step towards modernization in how fingerprint and criminal history records are maintained and accessed in Texas. By simplifying compliance and updating procedures for state agencies and individuals alike, the bill could serve as a model for future legislation aimed at addressing privacy and efficiency in criminal history management.

Contention

While HB 3323 seeks to improve the efficiency of processing fingerprint and criminal records, there may be concerns regarding the balance between accessibility and privacy. Advocacy groups may argue that while updates to records should be streamlined, there needs to be a robust mechanism to safeguard personal information from misuse. Additionally, lawmakers may debate whether the bill provides sufficient oversight regarding how the authorized sharing of information occurs and who qualifies as an entitled party.