Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB3338 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 13, 2009      TO: Honorable Vicki Truitt, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3338 by Hopson (Relating to debt cancellation contract agreements.), As Introduced   Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3338, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 13, 2009





  TO: Honorable Vicki Truitt, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB3338 by Hopson (Relating to debt cancellation contract agreements.), As Introduced  

TO: Honorable Vicki Truitt, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3338 by Hopson (Relating to debt cancellation contract agreements.), As Introduced

 Honorable Vicki Truitt, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services 

 Honorable Vicki Truitt, Chair, House Committee on Pensions, Investments & Financial Services 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB3338 by Hopson (Relating to debt cancellation contract agreements.), As Introduced

HB3338 by Hopson (Relating to debt cancellation contract agreements.), As Introduced

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3338, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. 

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3338, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds  2010 $0   2011 $0   2012 $0   2013 $0   2014 $0    


2010 $0
2011 $0
2012 $0
2013 $0
2014 $0

 All Funds, Five-Year Impact:  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009   2010 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0   2011 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2012 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2013 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2014 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0   

  Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Probable Revenue Gain fromGeneral Revenue Fund1  Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009   2010 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0   2011 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2012 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2013 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0   2014 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0  


2010 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0
2011 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0
2012 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0
2013 ($164,595) $164,595 2.0
2014 ($167,595) $167,595 2.0

Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend the Finance Code to allow motor vehicle retail sellers or holders to sell contract modification products in connection with retail installment contracts.   The bill would take effect September 1, 2009.

The bill would amend the Finance Code to allow motor vehicle retail sellers or holders to sell contract modification products in connection with retail installment contracts.

 

The bill would take effect September 1, 2009.

Methodology

Based on the information provided by the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner (OCCC), it is assumed that OCCC would require 2.0 additional positions, including 1 Financial Examiner I and 1 Legal Attorney II at the salary and benefit costs of $102,353 in each fiscal year from 2010-2015 in order to perform examinations on modified contracts offered by motor vehicle retail sellers. Other costs associated with the 2.0 FTEs include travel costs, other operating expenses, and consumable supplies, totaling $33,000 each fiscal year. Additional technology costs of $3,000 in fiscal year 2010 and 2014 include computers and software for new positions.   Based on information provided by the following agencies, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill for the Department of Banking, the Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, and the Credit Union Department could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.   The Department of Banking, Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner, and the Credit Union Department are self-leveling agencies and are statutorily required to generate revenues sufficient to cover all of the agency's direct and indirect costs.

Based on the information provided by the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner (OCCC), it is assumed that OCCC would require 2.0 additional positions, including 1 Financial Examiner I and 1 Legal Attorney II at the salary and benefit costs of $102,353 in each fiscal year from 2010-2015 in order to perform examinations on modified contracts offered by motor vehicle retail sellers. Other costs associated with the 2.0 FTEs include travel costs, other operating expenses, and consumable supplies, totaling $33,000 each fiscal year. Additional technology costs of $3,000 in fiscal year 2010 and 2014 include computers and software for new positions.

 

Based on information provided by the following agencies, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill for the Department of Banking, the Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, and the Credit Union Department could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.

 

The Department of Banking, Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner, and the Credit Union Department are self-leveling agencies and are statutorily required to generate revenues sufficient to cover all of the agency's direct and indirect costs.

Technology

Technology costs include $3,000 in fiscal years 2010 and 2014 for computers and software for 2.0 FTEs.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 450 Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, 451 Department of Banking, 466 Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner, 469 Credit Union Department

450 Department of Savings and Mortgage Lending, 451 Department of Banking, 466 Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner, 469 Credit Union Department

LBB Staff: JOB, ACa, JRO, MW

 JOB, ACa, JRO, MW