LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 25, 2009 TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3595 by McReynolds (Relating to the provision of drug court programs in this state.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3595, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($373,410) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 25, 2009
TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE:HB3595 by McReynolds (Relating to the provision of drug court programs in this state.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3595 by McReynolds (Relating to the provision of drug court programs in this state.), As Introduced
Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
Honorable Jim McReynolds, Chair, House Committee on Corrections
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3595 by McReynolds (Relating to the provision of drug court programs in this state.), As Introduced
HB3595 by McReynolds (Relating to the provision of drug court programs in this state.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3595, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($373,410) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB3595, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($373,410) through the biennium ending August 31, 2011.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds 2010 ($188,634) 2011 ($184,776) 2012 ($184,776) 2013 ($184,776) 2014 ($188,634)
2010 ($188,634)
2011 ($184,776)
2012 ($184,776)
2013 ($184,776)
2014 ($188,634)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009 2010 ($188,634) 2.0 2011 ($184,776) 2.0 2012 ($184,776) 2.0 2013 ($184,776) 2.0 2014 ($188,634) 2.0
Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2009 2010 ($188,634) 2.0 2011 ($184,776) 2.0 2012 ($184,776) 2.0 2013 ($184,776) 2.0 2014 ($188,634) 2.0
2010 ($188,634) 2.0
2011 ($184,776) 2.0
2012 ($184,776) 2.0
2013 ($184,776) 2.0
2014 ($188,634) 2.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code relating to the provision of drug court programs. The bill would authorize the presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions, after conferring with the judges of courts in their regions with a county population of not more than 200,000, to appoint one ore more full-time or part-time associate judges to operate a drug court program. The bill would take immediate effect if the bill receives two-thirds the vote of all members. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2009.
The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code relating to the provision of drug court programs. The bill would authorize the presiding judges of the administrative judicial regions, after conferring with the judges of courts in their regions with a county population of not more than 200,000, to appoint one ore more full-time or part-time associate judges to operate a drug court program. The bill would take immediate effect if the bill receives two-thirds the vote of all members. Otherwise, the bill would take effect September 1, 2009.
Methodology
This fiscal note assumes the presiding judges will operate at least one drug court program, requiring one associate judge (paid an annual salary of $94,300) and one court coordinator (paid an annual salary of $43,116) together with related benefits costs ($39,260). The court would require a travel budget, as the judge would serve more than one county and would need to travel to multiple locations to hold court (estimated at $6,000 each fiscal year). The budget would also provide for consumable supplies, telephone expenses, and other operating costs (estimated at $2,100 each fiscal year), together with a one-time equipment expense for computers, printers and other IT equipment that would need to be replaced every five years ($3,858 in fiscal year 2010 and 2014).
This fiscal note assumes the presiding judges will operate at least one drug court program, requiring one associate judge (paid an annual salary of $94,300) and one court coordinator (paid an annual salary of $43,116) together with related benefits costs ($39,260). The court would require a travel budget, as the judge would serve more than one county and would need to travel to multiple locations to hold court (estimated at $6,000 each fiscal year). The budget would also provide for consumable supplies, telephone expenses, and other operating costs (estimated at $2,100 each fiscal year), together with a one-time equipment expense for computers, printers and other IT equipment that would need to be replaced every five years ($3,858 in fiscal year 2010 and 2014).
Technology
The court would need personal computers, printers and other IT equipment that would need to be replaced every five years.
Local Government Impact
The bill would amend the Health and Safety Code relating to the provision of drug court programs. A local governmental entity that is designated as a host county must provide a courtroom, office space, including furniture, utilities, and telephone equipment and service for the associate judge appointed under the provisions of this bill. The fiscal impact to a local governmental entity would vary depending on the county the drug court is located in, the availability of existing space, and other resources required to implement the provisions of the bill.
Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 327 Employees Retirement System
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 327 Employees Retirement System
LBB Staff: JOB, ESi, TB, TP, DB
JOB, ESi, TB, TP, DB